താജ് മഹല് .. ചില സംശയങ്ങള്
ചില ചിത്രങ്ങളും വിവാദമുണ്ടാക്കിയ വിവരണങ്ങളുമാണിവ. ഏതായാലും എനിക്കിത് കിട്ടിയിട്ട് കുറച്ച് മാസങ്ങളേ ആയിട്ടുള്ളൂ.. (എവിടുന്ന് കിട്ടിയെന്ന് ചോദിച്ചാ.. സ്വപ്ന ഇത് ശരത്തിന് ഫോര്വേര്ഡ് ചെയ്തു, ശരത്ത് അത് ലക്ഷ്മിക്കും ലക്ഷ്മി ഇതു നൌഫലിനും പുള്ളി അതു ജാസ്മിനും അവിടുന്ന് ജോണ്സനും പിന്നെ ഇര്ഷാദിനും അവനത് അഞ്ജലിക്കും അവള് പിന്നെ എനിക്കും.. ഇത്രേ ഉള്ളൂ ഫോര്വേര്ഡിയ ലിസ്റ്റില്.. സോറി.. വേണെല് ഇനീം ഫോര്വേര്ഡാം.. ഐഡി തന്നാല് മതി..) കിട്ടിയത് അതേപടി തട്ടുന്നു..
Believe this - Hidden and Politically Suppressed Truth of Taj Mahal
BBC says about Taj Mahal---Hidden Truth - Never say it is a Tomb
Aerial view of the Taj Mahal
The interior water well
Close up of the pinnacle
Red lotus at apex of the entrance
Rear view of the Taj & 22 apartments
The Music House--a contradiction
Vedic design on ceiling of a locked room
The OM in the flowers on the walls
Staircase that leads to the lower levels
Secret bricked door that hides more evidence
Pavilion where Mumtaz is said to be buried
Interior of one of the 22 secret rooms
Interior of another of the locked rooms
Huge ventilator sealed shut with bricks
A marble apartment on ground floor
300 foot long corridor inside apartments
NOW READ THIS.......
No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak, who believes the whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says the Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz's tomb but an ancient
For example, Humayun, Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried in such mansions. Oak's inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says the term " Mahal " has never been used for a building in any Muslim countries from Afghanisthan to Algeria." The unusual explanation that the term Taj Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in atleast two respects.
Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani ," he writes. Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters 'Mum' from a woman's name to derive the remainder as the name for the building."Taj Mahal, he claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva's Palace . Oak also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created by court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists. Not a single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan's time corroborates the love story.
Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates Shah Jahan's era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a few samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan Albert Mandelslo,who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz's death), describes the life of the cit y in his memoirs. But he makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz's death, also suggest the Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahan's time.
Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu temple rather than a mausoleum. Many rooms in the Taj ! Mahal have remained sealed since Shah Jahan's time and are still inaccessible to the public. Oak asserts they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and other objects
commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples.. Fearing political backlash, Indira Gandhi's government tried to have Prof. Oak's book withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian publisher of the first edition dire consequences . There is only one way to discredit or validate Oak's research..
The current government should open the sealed rooms of the Taj Mahal under U.N. supervision, and let international experts investigate. Do circulate this to all you know and let them know about this reality.....
Satyameva Jayate, nothing else!
Indira Gandhi wanted no Indian to know about these valuable facts. In fact there are many such facts to be known. Let us do our best to educate every one, not alone Indians but the whole world about it. Internet and E-Mail is our boon. Let us disappoint Indira Gandhi for the good. Fellow Indians, with ur help and co-operation, we can reveal many more such facts and make them available to our people. You were fortunate enough to read this article, Its ur responsibility to give this privilege to others..
(ഇതില് അവസാനത്തെ പാരഗ്രാഫ് വായിച്ചിട്ട് എന്തിന് എന്നൊരു ചോദ്യം ചോദിക്കരുത്.. എനിക്കറിയില്ല.. )
4 അഭിപ്രായങ്ങള്:
കട്ടപ്പാരയും തൂമ്പായും കൊണ്ട് ഇതും ആരെങ്കിലും പൊളിക്കാന് ചെന്നാല് എന്നെ കുറ്റം പറയരുത്!!
ഇങ്ങനെയും കേട്ടിട്ടുണ്ട്.
Take a look at this URL for a better idea.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purushottam_Nagesh_Oak
As per the wiki database,
Purushottam Nagesh Oak (March 2 1917 - December 4 2007), commonly referred to as P. N. Oak, was an Indian writer and self-styled Professor, notable for his historical revisionism[1] based on the ideology of Hindutva. His claims, e.g. Christianity and Islam are both derivatives of Hinduism, or that the Kaaba and the Taj Mahal were once Hindu temples to Shiva[2], have largely been dismissed in mainstream academic circles, in India as well as the west, as examples of pseudohistory; he has been referred to as a "mythistorian"[3] or even "crackpot"[4].
Ithupoleyulla subject kannum adachu post cheyyunnathu bloginte visvasyathaye thanne badhikkilee sreekutta..
Post a Comment